AI-native product development

Build the right thing.
Ship it faster with AI.

We help teams clarify scope and scale delivery — through an agent-native workflow where AI handles execution and engineering judgment stays in the loop.

Trusted by product companies since 2015.

From pre-launch MVPs to products operating at scale, we’ve built with companies at different stages of growth.

  • Grubhub
  • Whoop
  • Forrester
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Verve Motion
  • Till
  • loog
  • Dust Identity

Our approach

AI-native product engineering starts before the build.

We get involved early to pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope, and decide what’s worth building before time and budget get locked in.

We apply AI across the full workflow — how we scope, build, test, and ship. Not as an experiment. As the way we work.

manage_search

Is this the right problem to solve?

The most expensive mistake is building the wrong thing well. We challenge the brief before we commit to it.

tune

Where does AI belong in this?

Not everywhere. We apply it where it accelerates, skip it where it adds risk not worth taking.

cycle

How do we move faster without losing control?

AI handles iteration and overhead. Engineering judgment stays in the loop throughout.

What we do

Agentic engineering. With humans in the loop.

Agents are how we program, what we build for clients, and the infrastructure layer we help organizations get right. Not demos. Production systems that work.

Explore all capabilities in detail

How we work

Built with agents. Governed by engineers.

This is how we work when we drive delivery. Agents handle execution across every phase. Engineering judgment stays in the loop throughout, defining what matters, designing structure, reviewing output, deciding what ships.

01

Define & Scope

The upfront work of clarifying what's worth doing and where the boundaries are, for a product, an agent's workflow, or an integration's reach. Agents compress research and constraint mapping. Judgment decides what gets locked.

Agents compress the cost of building. Not the cost of judgment.

Generating code got cheap. That makes mistakes in specs, architecture, and validation more expensive because they propagate faster now. The point isn't to use the most AI. It's to know where it helps and where to hold the line.

What agents unlock

Greenfield speed, parallel execution across modules, compression of repetitive work, and faster prototyping. Dramatic gains, when the spec is right.

What doesn't change

Getting the specification right. Keeping systems coherent as they grow. Judgment on complex scenarios. Specs are the new source code.

Our work

Case studies from
real products.

Selected work across food tech, climate tech, and consumer apps, from early-stage builds to products operating at scale.

Engineering perspectives on AI.

Our engineers write about the decisions behind AI-native delivery: evaluating LLMs, building agents, and making AI useful inside real products. It's the kind of thinking we bring into engagements, not content for content's sake.

Read more on our blog

Ready to talk about your next build?

Book a free 30-minute call with one of our specialists.

MaIA prxofile

MaIA

Typing...